<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Posts on Incoherent Sheaves</title><link>http://incoherent-sheaves.xyz/posts/</link><description>Recent content in Posts on Incoherent Sheaves</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 06:44:59 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://incoherent-sheaves.xyz/posts/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Re: Traditional Axes of Power</title><link>http://incoherent-sheaves.xyz/posts/2026-06-12-re-traditional-axes-of-power/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 06:44:59 -0600</pubDate><guid>http://incoherent-sheaves.xyz/posts/2026-06-12-re-traditional-axes-of-power/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://comind.store"&gt;comind&lt;/a&gt; recently put forward a breakdown of large-scale axes of power.
You can read about it &lt;a href="https://comind.store/posts/traditional-axes-of-power/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It reminded me a lot of &lt;a href="https://boomerdammerung.substack.com/p/moralitys-hidden-structure-why-pascal?utm_campaign=posts-open-in-app&amp;amp;triedRedirect=true"&gt;a series of posts on Substack&lt;/a&gt; arguing that the core of ethics is transgressing arenas&amp;ndash;trying to use the currency of strength, say, to purchase something in the realm of ideas. It&amp;rsquo;s interesting and seems to lightly map onto what comind is trying to do here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;comind&amp;rsquo;s initial breakdown is between &amp;ldquo;Church&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;Monarchy&amp;rdquo; as two traditional axes of power, in tension. Historically, I think this makes sense in broad strokes and outlining the differences in concerns, approach, and values seems like a good exercise.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>